We Love America
Standing at the Crossroads of Her Future
Standing at the Crossroads of Her Future
Mar 31st
Dear Mr. President,
I have just listened to a campaign speech you gave in Maine yesterday and am very surprised that you think Republicans don’t care about people and how their “you’re on your own” approach to economics is somehow un-American. Well, Mr. President, I think you have a mis-understanding of how the republicans really feel and what real American tradition is. Republicans believe that part of the reason our country became as great as it has is because we have a tradition of independence and a “can do” attitude. We really don’t believe in free handouts. And, we certainly want to help every American in need. What we want to avoid at all costs is creating a dependant class. That is more caring and loving than to have people become dependant upon others for their welfare. Giving free stuff to people doesn’t make them free. Giving things for free doesn’t free people Mr. President, that enslaves them. We both know that it is generally human nature to take the easy way out. If people can get things free, why would they work?
If more and more people can get free things, fewer and fewer people would want to work. Then we would wind up like many European countries that have promised their citizens so many free things that now they are going bankrupt. And, once you give something to people it is hard to take it away.
People are rioting in the streets in Greece because the government now has to raise the retirement age from 50 to 51. Isn’t that crazy?
Please have one of your advisors review your American History. When the Jamestown colony tried to survive on a socialistic basis where everyone contributed everything they earned and everyone took what they needed, they almost all starved to death. Only by instituting a plan, where people kept what they produced and traded freely , were the leaders able to save the colony. That is kindness that works for everyone and makes everyone’s life better.
You should re-think your stand on giving everyone what they need without asking for anything in return. History has shown, it doesn’t work.
Mar 25th
Carl: The author and your definition includes the following quote “While modern social conditions hold the potential to maximize the individual freedom and pleasure of all, there is much work to be done to dismantle the vestiges of inequality, exploitation, and repression. This struggle for the good society in which individuals are equal and free to pursue their self- defined happiness is the one mission truly worth dedicating one’s life work to achieving”. Whether or not you include or as you have, exclude Capitalism, that statement can easily be applied to a Conservative. What Conservative does not desire to maximize individual freedom, pleasure for all (“the pursuit of happiness”) and the noble human aspiration for autonomy, equality and prosperity? What Conservative would argue against dismantling the vestiges of inequality, exploitation, and repression? The difference is where you start and where you stop!
I think these are all noble pursuits and fit the Classical definition of what was then called Liberalism, now called Conservatism. I think it’s a question of degree. The Conservative, as well as the Liberal wants all those things, but the Conservative’s rules for achieving those goals is different that the Progressive. The Conservative views uncontrolled spending towards those goals and its inevitable and resultant taxation as a ‘taking’. The Conservatives holds that his rights end where your rights begin while the Progressive knows no such limits. Once you have this unfttered dynamic there will be a natural rise of a class of rabble rousers that see the Progressive’s unfettered goals as a way to power. The more they give the more they get elected. The more of them that they get elected by the slowly rising slave class (generation after generation of welfare addicts) the more power accrues to the elected and by straying away from the precepts that made America great the less free we become. It’s normal for humans to take the easy path, stay home and collect welfare, free health benefits, food stamps? Or go out and break your ass competing for a job and a good wage and a good life? It’s easy to understand why we move slowly and inexorably toward total dependence on the state. Once we were slaves to an English King and government now we have become slaves to our own elected officials and the bueaucracy they erect to give or deny permission for our every decision. You and I know that this will end badly as every such egalitarian social justice cult has ended. No one can name one successful society that practiced what is defined as progressivism and succeeded. They must fail because at some tipping point there are inevitably more takers than givers. It’s the ultimate Ponzi scheme except in a Ponzi scheme people make a voluntary decision to participate, you and I have no such choice as long as we are outnumbered, and while the media and academia and the education system is controlled by the Left. The leftists truly believe the Alinski principle (and the Jihadist principle) that the ends justify any means to achieve their goals.
Mar 24th
I have just received this month’s issue of Reason magazine and was intrigued by an article by Jonathan Haidt, a psychology professor at the University of Virginia. He tries to explain why some people become conservatives and others become liberals or progressives. Simplifying his theme to the extreme, he thinks “it’s in the genes”. What grabbed my attention most in his thesis is his description of each side’s “Grand Narrative”.
For years, I have been trying to figure out the rationale of progressives or the left. How can it be, I asked myself that so many seemingly intelligent people can be so blind and so oblivious to the flaws in their political logic that they come off seeming like they are unable to follow a logical argument
, or, are incapable of making the next logical step in their argument. Why do they not understand why their vision of the future would never work. Well, thanks to Mr. Haidt, I may have found an answer.
In his assessment of things, Mr Haidt says, each side, progressives and conservatives, and I suppose everyone else for that matter, in order to make sense of the world gradually constructs his own “Grand Narrative”. A person’s grand narrative is a morally based view of the world, how it works, and his or her role in it.
The progressives’ grand narrative goes something like this: “Once upon a time the…majority of people suffered in societies and social institutions that were unjust, unhealthy, repressive, and oppressive. These…societies were reprehensible because of their deep-rooted inequality, exploitation and irrational traditionalism. ..But, the noble human aspiration for autonomy, equality and prosperity struggled…against the forces of misery and oppression and eventually succeeded in establishing modern, liberal, democratic, welfare societies.* While modern social conditions hold the potential to maximize the individual freedom and pleasure of all, there is much work to be done to dismantle the vestiges of inequality, exploitation, and repression. This struggle for the good society in which individuals are equal and free to pursue their self- defined happiness is the one mission truly worth dedicating one’s life work to achieving”
In contrast, the modern conservative grand narrative goes something like this: “Once upon a time, America was a shining beacon. Then liberals came along and erected an enormous federal bureaucracy that handcuffed the invisible hand of the free market, the source of our great prosperity. They subverted our traditional American values and opposed God and faith at every step of the way. ..Instead of requiring people to work for a living, they siphoned money from hardworking Americans and gave it to Cadillac-driving drug addicts and welfare queens. Instead of punishing criminals, they tried to “understand” them. Instead of worrying about the victims of crime they worried about the rights of criminals..Instead of adhering to traditional American values of family, fidelity and personal responsibility, they preached promiscuity, premarital sex and the gay lifestyle and they encouraged a feminine agenda that undermined traditional family roles,… instead of projecting strength to those who would do evil around the world, they cut military budgets, disrespected our soldiers in uniform, burned our flag and chose
negotiation and multilateralism…, Then Americans decided to take their country back from those who chose to undermine it.”
Two very different narratives. Both sides claiming the moral high ground. It is easy to see why no compromise can be reached, why there is no congeniality between the parties. The one side wants to tear everything down, the other wants to protect the great society we have created.
Conservatives view the opposition as a bunch of morally bankrupt radicals, attempting to physically bankrupt the country and destroy everything that conservatives hold sacred so that they can live hedonistic , selfish, irresponsible decadent lives supported by the efforts of the moral, hard working conservatives who the radicals intend to destroy.
Progressives, on the other hand see conservatives as a backward looking bunch of individuals intent upon the continual and criminal repression and exploitation of the working classes, intent on maintaining the status quo so that they can continue living comfortable lives at the expense of the masses and use religion and tradition to accomplish there desires. Unconcerned about their fellow man, conservatives consider redistribution of wealth a confiscation of their hard earned money. Insstead of looking at government benefits as a way of helping individuals, conservatives think government handouts weaken the society and the individuals receiving the handouts.
Both sides claim the moral high ground. Neither one understands the other and in an effort to reconcile their differences, each side demonizes the other.
Compormise seems unattainable. Where do we go from here
*I have deliberately left out the original quote “…liberal, democratic, capitalistic, welfare societies…” because I do not agree that progressives believe in capitalism as a good in the world, and I think that better describes their grand narrative.
Mar 20th
Watch this movie trailer and then watch Dinesh D’Souza’s speech at CPAC:
http://2016themovie.com/trailer/
Jan 24th
My blog partner Carl and I although we agree wholeheartedly on Conservative principles, disagree only on which of the two leading candidates has the most honestly held Conservative core principles. I believe Mitt Romney does while Carl thinks Newt is the best choice to both unseat Obama and lead a Conservative movement. Just read Romney’s concession speech to CPAC in 2008, every last word of it, and then tell me who best expresses the Conservative precepts this nation must adopt to survive and prosper:
I want to begin by saying thank you. It’s great to be with you again. To all of you, thank you for caring enough about the future of America to show up, stand up and speak up for conservative principles.
As I said to you last year, conservative principles are needed now more than ever. We face a new generation of challenges, challenges which threaten our prosperity, our security and our future. I am convinced that unless America changes course, we will become the France of the 21st century—still a great nation, but no longer the leader of the world, no longer the superpower. And to me, that is unthinkable. Simon Peres, in a visit to Boston, was asked what he thought about the war in Iraq. “First,” he said, “I must put something in context. America is unique in the history of the world. In the history of the world, whenever there has been conflict, the nation that wins takes land from the nation that loses. One nation in history, and this during the last century, laid down hundreds of thousands of lives and took no land. No land from Germany, no land from Japan, no land from Korea. America is unique in the sacrifice it has made for liberty, for itself and for freedom loving people around the world. The best ally peace has ever known, and will ever know, is a strong America!”
And that is why we must rise to the occasion, as we have always done before, to confront the challenges ahead. Perhaps the most fundamental of these is the attack on the American culture.
Over the years, my business has taken me to many countries. I have been struck by the enormous differences in the wealth and well-being of people of different nations. I have read a number of scholarly explanations for the disparities. I found the most convincing was that written by David Landes, a professor emeritus from Harvard University. I presume he’s a liberal–I guess that’s redundant. His work traces the coming and going of great civilizations throughout history. After hundreds of pages of analysis, he concludes with this:
If we learn anything from the history of economic development, it is that culture makes all the difference. Culture makes all the difference.
What is it about American culture that has led us to become the most powerful nation in the history of the world? We believe in hard work and education. We love opportunity: almost all of us are immigrants or descendants of immigrants who came here for opportunity—opportunity is in our DNA. Americans love God, and those who don’t have faith, typically believe in something greater than themselves—a “Purpose Driven Life.” And we sacrifice everything we have, even our lives, for our families, our freedoms and our country. The values and beliefs of the free American people are the source of our nation’s strength and they always will be!
The threat to our culture comes from within. The 1960’s welfare programs created a culture of poverty. Some think we won that battle when we reformed welfare, but the liberals haven’t given up. At every turn, they try to substitute government largesse for individual responsibility. They fight to strip work requirements from welfare, to put more people on Medicaid, and to remove more and more people from having to pay any income tax whatsoever. Dependency is death to initiative, risk-taking and opportunity. Dependency is a culture-killing drug—we have got to fight it like the poison it is!
The attack on faith and religion is no less relentless. And tolerance for pornography—even celebration of it—and sexual promiscuity, combined with the twisted incentives of government welfare programs have led to today’s grim realities: 68% of African American children are born out-of-wedlock, 45% of Hispanic children, and 25% of White children. How much harder it is for these children to succeed in school—and in life. A nation built on the principles of the founding fathers cannot long stand when its children are raised without fathers in the home.
The development of a child is enhanced by having a mother and father. Such a family is the ideal for the future of the child and for the strength of a nation. I wonder how it is that unelected judges, like some in my state of Massachusetts, are so unaware of this reality, so oblivious to the millennia of recorded history. It is time for the people of America to fortify marriage through constitutional amendment, so that liberal judges cannot continue to attack it!
Europe is facing a demographic disaster. That is the inevitable product of weakened faith in the Creator, failed families, disrespect for the sanctity of human life and eroded morality. Some reason that culture is merely an accessory to America’s vitality; we know that it is the source of our strength. And we are not dissuaded by the snickers and knowing glances when we stand up for family values, and morality, and culture. We will always be honored to stand on principle and to stand for principle.
The attack on our culture is not our sole challenge. We face economic competition unlike anything we have ever known before. China and Asia are emerging from centuries of poverty. Their people are plentiful, innovative, and ambitious. If we do not change course, Asia or China will pass us by as the economic superpower, just as we passed England and France during the last century. The prosperity and security of our children and grandchildren depend on us.
Our prosperity and security also depend on finally acting to become energy secure. Oil producing states like Russia and Venezuela, Saudi Arabia and Iran are siphoning over $400 billion per year from our economy—that’s almost what we spend annually for defense. It is past time for us to invest in energy technology, nuclear power, clean coal, liquid coal, renewable sources and energy efficiency. America must never be held hostage by the likes of Putin, Chavez, and Ahmendinejad.
And our economy is also burdened by the inexorable ramping of government spending. Don’t focus on the pork alone—even though it is indeed irritating and shameful. Look at the entitlements. `They make up 60% of federal spending today. By the end of the next President’s second term, they will total 70%. Any conservative plan for the future has to include entitlement reform that solves the problem, not just acknowledges it.
Most politicians don’t seem to understand the connection between our ability to compete and our national wealth, and the wealth of our families. They act as if money just happens–that it’s just there. But every dollar represents a good or service produced in the private sector. Depress the private sector and you depress the well-being of Americans.
That’s exactly what happens with high taxes, over-regulation, tort windfalls, mandates, and overfed, over-spending government. Did you see that today, government workers make more money than people who work in the private sector. Can you imagine what happens to an economy where the best opportunities are for bureaucrats?
It’s high time to lower taxes, including corporate taxes, to take a weed-whacker to government regulations, to reform entitlements, and to stand up to the increasingly voracious appetite of the unions in our government!
And finally, let’s consider the greatest challenge facing America—and facing the entire civilized world: the threat of violent, radical Jihad. In one wing of the world of Islam, there is a conviction that all governments should be destroyed and replaced by a religious caliphate. These Jihadists will battle any form of democracy—to them, democracy is blasphemous for it says that citizens, not God shape the law. They find the idea of human equality to be offensive. They hate everything we believe about freedom just as we hate everything they believe about radical Jihad.
To battle this threat, we have sent the most courageous and brave soldiers in the world. But their numbers have been depleted by the Clinton years when troops were reduced by 500,000, when 80 ships were retired from the Navy, and when our human intelligence was slashed by 25%. We were told that we were getting a peace dividend. We got the dividend, but we didn’t get the peace. In the face of evil in radical Jihad and given the inevitable military ambitions of China, we must act to rebuild our military might. Raise military spending to 4% of our GDP, purchase the most modern armament, re-shape our fighting forces for the asymmetric demands we now face, and give the veterans the care they deserve!
Soon, the face of liberalism in America will have a new name. Whether it is Barack or Hillary, the result would be the same if they were to win the Presidency. The opponents of American culture would push the throttle, devising new justifications for judges to depart from the constitution. Economic neophytes would layer heavier and heavier burdens on employers and families, slowing our economy and opening the way for foreign competition to further erode our lead.
Even though we face an uphill fight, I know that many in this room are fully behind my campaign.” You are with me all the way to the convention. Fight on, just like Ronald Reagan did in 1976. But there is an important difference from 1976: today… we are a nation at war.
And Barack and Hillary have made their intentions clear regarding Iraq and the war on terror. They would retreat and declare defeat. And the consequence of that would be devastating. It would mean attacks on America, launched from safe havens that make Afghanistan under the Taliban look like child’s play. About this, I have no doubt.
I disagree with Senator McCain on a number of issues, as you know. But I agree with him on doing whatever it takes to be successful in Iraq, on finding and executing Osama bin Laden, and on eliminating Al Qaeda and terror. If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.
This is not an easy decision for me. I hate to lose. My family, my friends and our supporters… many of you right here in this room… have given a great deal to get me where I have a shot at becoming President. If this were only about me, I would go on. But I entered this race because I love America, and because I love America, I feel I must now stand aside, for our party and for our country.
I will continue to stand for conservative principles; I will fight alongside you for all the things we believe in. And one of those things is that we cannot allow the next President of the United States to retreat in the face evil extremism!!
It is the common task of each generation—and the burden of liberty—to preserve this country, expand its freedoms and renew its spirit so that its noble past is prologue to its glorious future.
To this task… accepting this burden… we are all dedicated, and I firmly believe, by the providence of the Almighty, that we will succeed beyond our fondest hope. America must remain, as it has always been, the hope of the earth.
Thank you, and God bless America.
Jan 22nd

Now that South Carolina is in the win column for Newt Gingrich, Florida seems very attainable and we can get down to the business of getting Gingrich elected. I will admit that not very long ago I almost gave up on the Grinch. His caustic remarks and holier than thou attitude was alienating even the best of supporters, myself included. I did however, think that he was truly the most conservative of the bunch and understands what has made America Great. I think the turning point was how he answered the leading question at the latest debate about his first wife. He called it just right, saying what all of us knew to be true about a biased media and nailed the culprit red handed. The timing of this “latest story” was what gave the media away and Americans are tired of it. The contrast between how Republicans and Democrats are treated by the media has become glaringly obvious to even the most casual observers. John Kerry who is much richer than Romney was never questioned by the media about his wealth. He didn’t even earn it like Romney, he married it. But, no questions were ever asked by the media. We all know how Clintons’s peccadilloes were deftly handled by the media to minimize any possible damage to their wonder boy.
Gingrich’s platform is easy enough for anyone to understand and far reaching enough to matter. Reduce the deficit, Pay down our debt, Work toward Energy Independence, Provide a job not a handout, treat people like they can, not like they cannot, Rid the judiciary of activist judges.
Gingrich knows just how badly Obama has hurt America and what it takes to fix it.
Let’s end the bickering and prepare to unseat Obama in November and deliver a Republican victory in both houses.
God Bless America.
Jan 15th
If you were paying attention in school, you should know what a Lame Duck president is. For those of you who don’t, it is a president who because he is in his second and last possible term as president is a “lame duck”, which means he is in power and control of his second administration and cannot be re-elected. As with all laws there are unexpected consequences. In this particular situation and particularly pivotal upcoming election, there is the possibility that Obama may be re-elected! In this case the unexpected consequences, assuming he gets both houses of Congress back, is that he will have completely unfettered access to all of the accepted powers of the presidency and in his case the imagined powers of the presidency via Executive Orders, Interim Nominations,recess nominations, etc. Most of all since he cannot be re-elected, he can do whatever he wants and cannot be held accountable by the electorate, short of a treasonous act.
Imagine if you will the amount of damage such a possibility could bring
Some things to think and worry about:
• Sixteen trillion dollars of debt and climbing, 1.2 Trillion more in the hopper
• Twenty five million unemployed & climbing
• Forty million on food stamps & climbing
• America’s credit rating downgraded
• Middle East sliding towards Islamism
• Obamacare’s implementation
• More onerous regulations from EPA, NLRB, CPSC, Dodd-Frank, et al.
• Justice department choosing which laws they will enforce
• More Stimulus and more TARP’s
• Crony capitalism, choosing winners and losers
• Passage of the Dream Act for legitimizing illegal aliens
• Continued dependency on foreign sources of energy
• A nuclear armed Iran and North Korea…
Imagine how much more damage he could do in the next FIVE years? If he gets both houses he would be a virtual dictator doing whatever he wanted, imposing his Alinsky vision of America on the rest of us.
Keep this in mind when you vote for in the upcoming primaries should they continue, but most of all tuck this nugget away and remember it when you pull the levers in November 2012.
Don’t say you weren’t warned!
Jan 7th
I’ve been in your camp for some time now, going back to the last election. When you were out of that race I had no choice but to hold my nose and vote for McCain, the self-admitted Progressive or Obama-Lite. He’d have gotten us where we are now headed, only at a slower pace.
I think you’re getting a bad rap being called a RINO. My sense is that you are a Conservative at heart. Your Dad’s life story and family background, your work background, your family values all tell me that at the core you have Conservative values. Just come out and say it. Promise the American people that if elected you will exercise a Conservative agenda and then keep your promise. Just say it and say it often. Speak from your heart and we’ll know you are speaking the truth.
You are in a singular position to be the leader who can save this precious republic for which so many have suffered and died. If you live up to your promise and your capabilities as a leader there is no doubt that you will be in the honorable company of our best presidents, Washington, Lincoln and Reagan. Imagine being in the pantheon of great president for the entire history of this country. That’s something that should motivate you to move the mountains and obstructions that will be in your way. If you are successful in stemming the slow undoing of the principles and values upon which this country was built your reward will be the undying respect of a grateful people. Like a giant super liner it will take years to change course but over a long distance a one degree change of course can take a ship to a totally different destination.
When you are elected, I predict, just on the strength of your election, the economy will take off like a rocket. Entrepreneurs waiting on the sidelines will rejuvenate the economy. Unemployment will be lowered. It will be the “Romney Effect”. Doubt and worry will disappear and be replaced with the certainty that a steady hand is once again at the helm of the ship of state. If the people give you the Senate and the House you will be empowered to do the things that need to be done. Like pulling off a bandage, do it quickly, feel the pain and get past it. Smaller government, less regulations and red tape, lower personal and corporate tax rates, a simplified tax structure, debt reduction (trillions not billions), new plans to either repair or replace Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security with viable plans, fiscal sanity, end Obamacare, seal the borders and really do something about energy independence rather than just talk about it. . And most importantly, job number one should be restoring the Constitution to its rightful place in our society as the immutable contract that we the people have with the government.
It will be a really challenging job that will need a really great and dedicated leader. I’m convinced you are that leader and now is your time, get out there and convince the rest of us, yet unconvinced, that you are the right person at the right time.
Dec 17th
Dear Mr. President, Dec 15, 2011
This was a very busy week for me at work, but I did notice that you have been trying to convince
people that Capitalism has been a dismal failure. With all due respect Mr. President, I think that even a casual look at the world and at history would force one to come to a completely opposite conclusion.
Lets look at results and not spin. To be born or living in the United States today is probably the luckiest thing that a person could have happen to them. The OWS crowd seem to think that if someone has so much more than they do, that the system is failing, and something must be done.
Attempting to equalize incomes through taxation (confiscation) has never worked and will never work anywhere in the world. Look at the American experience. In the early days the settlers tried a commune system where everyone shared equally in what was produced. It soon turned out that almost everyone was on the verge of starvation. Have a look, Mr. President, at William Bradford’s description of one of our earliest settlements, Plymouth Plantation. He tells how unproductive and wasteful the settlement became because everyone shared equally. It was only when those who didn’t produce didn’t share, that the Plantation became prosperous.
This is no longer taught in the progressive government schools because it does not promote their vision of how the world should work. Just look at Cuba, A worker’s paradise?, The Soviet Union, replete with shortages, any third world country where everyone depends upon the government.
Even the poor in America are better off than most of the rest of the world.
Your speeches reflect your background, but not reality. Capitalism is self correcting, government is not. A capitalist ponzi scheme is illegal and ultimately comes to an end, the participants lick their wounds, and life goes on. A government ponzi scheme is legal, like social security, it sucks resources from every other area of the economy, and when it ends. Participants cannot lick their wounds. They are screwed. One of these days you will start to agree with me.
So, please think about it Mr. President. Instead of strangling and blaming Capitalism, try to let it function freely and watch the results.
Dec 10th
A friend sent me a link today to Rep. Rohrbacher’s bill introduced in the House. See it below and my email to my friend.
“Mike:
Thanks for the link to your blog and also the link to Rorhbacher’s bill. It of course restates what is obvious to anyone who is alive,literate and awake. There are millions, no, billions of individual re-affirmations of the successes of Capitalism and just as many examples of the ongoing failure of the Socialist model. You would think that in the absence of their ability to point to ONE, just ONE socialist success that any sentient, critical thinking human being would admit its dismal failures, past present and future. It makes blood shoot out of my eyes when Progressives spout statements usually giving phony, distorted statistics, that they have uncritically absorbed into their mushy brains, advancing their leftist program.
The sheep who live off the largesse of the left’s entitlements, exorbitant pensions and bloated government salaries are the left’s army. Their generals are the elite who think they, within their elitist compounds, can make better decisions for the masses than the collective knowledge of the masses they deplore.
Inexorably they lead us in very small steps towards the undoing of this, the greatest political invention in all of living history, a democratic Republic in which the people rule. At least that’s the way it was meant to work.
Vince”
Click here:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-hr422/text
This just in! Every word a distortion of the historical truth:
Obama’s address yesterday in Osawatomie, Kan., where the president stated:
“… there is a certain crowd in Washington who, for the last few decades, have said, let’s respond to this economic challenge with the same old tune. “The market will take care of everything,” they tell us. If we just cut more regulations and cut more taxes – especially for the wealthy – our economy will grow stronger. Sure, they say, there will be winners and losers. But if the winners do really well, then jobs and prosperity will eventually trickle down to everybody else. And, they argue, even if prosperity doesn’t trickle down, well, that’s the price of liberty.
Now, it’s a simple theory. And we have to admit, it’s one that speaks to our rugged individualism and our healthy skepticism of too much government. That’s in America’s DNA. And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. But here’s the problem: It doesn’t work. It has never worked. It didn’t work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. It’s not what led to the incredible postwar booms of the ’50s and ’60s. And it didn’t work when we tried it during the last decade. I mean, understand, it’s not as if we haven’t tried this theory.”
Recent Comments